Kern Sibbald said:
> Hello again,
>
> You didn't by any chance recently upgrade from a 2.4 kernel to a 2.6
> kernel
> did you?    I am seeing all kinds of hangs and other funny behavior in the
> Storage daemon due to the change in the behavior of the open() call for
> tape
> drives from one kernel to another.
>
Thanks for looking at this so quickly Kern-

No, I am running a 2.6 kernel, but I have been running it for 18 months or
so.  I'm running a vintage Fedora Core 2 release--too lazy (and afraid) to
upgrade on this system that is critical to my home network.  There has not
been a new Core2 kernel in quite some time--my last kernel upgrade was in
March, which I'm positive I was running, at least by August (I know I
rebooted about that time).

I'm a networking software engineer, so although I have a lot of capability
to maintain, fix and debug a lot of stuff here at home, I don't have much
in the way of spare time--consequently, I tend to keep using things if
they are still working.  I did want to switch to Bacuala 1.38, LTO2 and
Fedora Core4, but have so far only done the first upgrade (bacula).  I saw
messages on bacula-users about recent 2.6 changes, and was hoping that any
dust would have settled by the time I got there (presumably when I get
around to FC4--or FC5, if I continue to put it off any longer).

If it would help, I can turn on some sd logging, or something.  The poll
interval suggestion will probably work for me for now, especially once I
get the LTO2 drive online, making nearly all of my backups a 1 tape
affair.

Thanks!

-- 
-se

Steve Ellis


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to