I could easily be on the wrong track. :) Sorry, I will try to be a bit clearer on the network configuration. Not quite sure what pieces are most useful however... Here is my guess at a clearer network configuration.

Basically, I have one linux box that has two ethernet cards running iptables with NAT/Masquerading. One is for the extranet and one for my intranet (10.0.0.x). The internal network has 3-5 network devices / computers. Each device has an assigned static ip in the 10.0.0.x/255.0.0.0 range with the gateway at 10.0.0.1. I usually just use IP's (e.g. ssh 10.0.0.5 or http://10.0.0.5/) to talk amongst the internal boxes. One of the internal boxes is the one with redhat linux ES 4 on it where I have installed bacula as described below. I have /etc/hosts set to define 10.0.0.5 (bacula/rh linux box) to be inside.waldow.net and inside which my well be incorrect. I also have / etc/host.conf set to use hosts then bind for name resolution. I can ping / ssh 10.0.0.5, inside, or inside.waldow.net and it works as far as I can tell.

So, for some reason the first configuration below seems to function while the second configuration didn't and produced those errors.

Does this help?


On Sep 28, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote:

Not sure you're on the right track. I assume these machines can communicate with each other for other purposes. To me what jumps out is that the director is not listening on 10.0.0.5:9101 -- either because it's listening on its external IP itself, or it's not running. There is no clear indication to me whether inside=10.0.0.5, but presumably the network has little to do with it if you're running bconsole from the same machine... try to be a little more clear with your network topography and there may be more I can say.

---- _  _ _  _ ___  _  _  _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.| IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630


Dean Waldow wrote:


Hi,

I have been trying to install bacula on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES
release 4 box with out additional clients to start with. I have been
having trouble with either I believe network issues or authorization
issues. I can't tell.  I currently have the box behind a NAT with an
internal IP. I have it defined in my /etc/hosts file but it doesn't have a DNS entry. I also have hosts before bind. So it should resolve from hosts
before going to DNS I think.

I finally got a configuration to work, but I have had numerous errors of the following sort before that.

28-Sep 09:50 gnome-console: Fatal error: bnet.c:775 Unable to connect to
Director daemon on inside:9101. ERR=Connection refused

If I tried localhost or straight IP I get the same:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula]# ./bconsole
Connecting to Director 10.0.0.5:9101
28-Sep 09:53 bconsole:  Fatal error: bnet.c:775 Unable to connect to
Director daemon on 10.0.0.5:9101. ERR=Connection refused
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula]# nano bconsole.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bacula]# ./bconsole
Connecting to Director localhost:9101
28-Sep 09:53 bconsole:  Fatal error: bnet.c:775 Unable to connect to
Director daemon on localhost:9101. ERR=Connection refused

Here is the example config file I used that finally seems to work at least for the tutorial example so far. I am unsure whether it is best for a redhat install or not.

CFLAGS="-g -Wall" \
  ./configure \
    --sbindir=$HOME/bacula/bin \
    --sysconfdir=$HOME/bacula/bin \
    --with-pid-dir=$HOME/bacula/bin/working \
    --with-subsys-dir=$HOME/bacula/bin/working \
    --enable-smartalloc \
    --enable-gnome \
    --enable-static-tools \
    --with-mysql \
    --with-working-dir=$HOME/bacula/bin/working \
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] \
    --with-smtp-host=localhost  \
    --enable-conio \
    --enable-tray-monitor

I then was able to run the basic tutorial test and it seemed to work after setting up the bacula database in mysql, starting the services, and leaving *.conf files alone.
So, questions...

1) I think my problems have to do with trying to run bacula on computer in an internal 10.0.0.x home network. The main connection to the internet is DNS resolvable but my internal computers are simple 10.0.0.x IP addresses... How have folks dealt with this to make bacula work since if I am understanding correctly it expects every computer resolve from DNS? I would like to back up my computers in my internal network. I will be using bacula at work also but all the computers there are dns resolvable.

2) The redhat example configuration has not worked yet (I am guessing because of the DNS resolution questions though I can't see why it should not). The example config I used follows. What do redhat ES4 folks think is a 'good' config? Any selinux concerns?

CFLAGS="-g -Wall" ./configure   \
--prefix=/usr  \
--sbindir=/usr/sbin   \
--sysconfdir=/etc/bacula   \
--with-scriptdir=/etc/bacula \
--enable-smartalloc   \
--enable-gnome   \
--with-mysql   \
--with-working-dir=/var/bacula   \
--with-pid-dir=/var/run\
--with-subsys-dir=/var/lock/subsys   \
--enable-conio \
--enable-tray-monitor

Thanks for any suggestions...

Dean W.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---

Dean Waldow, Professor               (253) 535-7533

Department of Chemistry              (253) 536-5055 (FAX)

Pacific Lutheran University [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Tacoma, WA  98447   USA              http://www.chem.plu.edu/waldow/

--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---

---> CIRRUS and the Chemistry homepage: <http://www.chem.plu.edu/> <----

--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---









-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to