Kern Sibbald schrieb:
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 14:00, Carsten Schurig wrote:
Unlikely, but I would be happy if someone tried.
I did install 1.37.30 and changed the following of the configuration
addtionally:
* switched from sqlite to mysql
* use my 2 DDS-3 drives as single ones instead of "emulating"
a autochanger
Currently on my Windows 2K server two concurrent jobs are running (one
to drive 1 and the other one to drive 2). Both are running at about
1 MB/s (instead of 100 KB/s)!
BTW: I had to use different pools to get the concurrent jobs working. Is
this ok? My first try was to do something like that
Job {
Client = win2k
FileSet = "win2k 1"
Storage = tape1
Pool = WeeklyPool
}
Job {
Client = win2k
FileSet = "win2k 2"
Storage = tape2
Pool = WeeklyPool
}
In both drives a valid tape was inserted and the pools are defined with
"Accept Any Volume = yes", but the second job started was always
complaining:
Cannot find any appendable volumes.
Please use the "label" command to create a new Volume for:
Storage: tape2 (/dev/nst1)
Media type: DDS-3
Pool: WeeklyPool
So I created a pool WeeklyPool2 and moved tape2 to that pool and changed
the job accordingly. After this the jobs are really running
concurrently. Is this behaviour correct?
Cheers,
Carsten
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
