On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 18:58 +0100, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:59:22 +0200, Mario Ohnewald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >>>>> said:
> 
>   Mario> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 20:19 +0100, Martin Simmons wrote:
>   >> >>>>> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:31:56 +0200, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]> said:
>   >> 
>   Kern> On Monday 18 July 2005 19:32, Martin Simmons wrote:
>   >> >> >>>>> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:46:00 +0200, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]>
>   >> >> >>>>> said:
>   >> >> 
>   Arno> Volker Sauer wrote:
>   >> >> >> On Fr, 15 Jul 2005, Mario Ohnewald wrote:
>   >> >> >>> In my eyes this is a huge "bug".
>   >> >> >>>
>   >> >> >>> Lets says you have a big home directory with a couple of projects 
> and
>   >> >> >>> sourcecode files in there, and you reorganize the folder structure
>   >> >> >>> and you move some files and folders around.
>   >> >> >>>
>   >> >> >>> All this then would NOT be included in a backup!
>   >> >> >>> What's the point of a backup then?
>   >> >> >>
>   >> >> >> In this case you should submit a bug in the bug database at
>   >> >> >> bacula.org.
>   >> >> 
>   Arno> Indeed.
>   Arno> According to bacula's manual, Director configuration, Jobs, Job
>   >> >> Level Arno> Incremental:
>   >> >> 
>   Arno> The File daemon (Client) decides which files to backup for an
>   Arno> Incremental backup by comparing start time of the prior Job (Full,
>   Arno> Differential, or Incremental) against the time each file was last
>   Arno> ``modified'' (st_mtime) and the time its attributes were last
>   Arno> ``changed''(st_ctime). If the file was modified or its attributes
>   Arno> changed on or after this start time, it will then be backed up.
>   >> >> 
>   Arno> So, a mv'ed file should be backed up:
>   Arno> # ls >> datetest
>   Arno> # ls -l datetest
>   Arno> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 944 Jul 15 23:20 datetest
>   Arno> # ls -lc datetest
>   Arno> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 944 Jul 15 23:20 datetest
>   Arno> # sleep 60; mv datetest testdate
>   Arno> # ls -lc testdate
>   Arno> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 944 Jul 15 23:21 testdate
>   Arno> # ls -l testdate
>   Arno> -rw-r--r--  1 root root 944 Jul 15 23:20 testdate
>   >> >> 
>   Arno> So, at least o my linux box the ctime is modified by mv'ing a file
>   >> >> - Arno> which is correct concerning POSIX etc. standards, I believe.
>   >> >> 
>   Arno> Accordingly, bacula should back up this file.
>   >> >> 
>   >> >> Correct, but if you move a directory then the files within it do not 
> change
>   >> >> ctime or mtime and hence will not be backed up. E.g.
>   >> >> 
>   >> >> # mkdir -p test1/inner test2
>   >> >> # ls >> test1/inner/datetest
>   >> >> # ls -l test1/inner/datetest
>   >> >> # ls -lc test1/inner/datetest
>   >> >> # sleep 60; mv test1/inner test2
>   >> >> # ls -lc test2/inner/datetest
>   >> >> 
>   >> >> In fact, they probably shouldn't be backed up -- it is another 
> variant of
>   >> >> the problem with incr/diff restore not restoring renamed things 
> correctly.
>   >> 
>   Kern> I would word it differently, because as far as I know restore always 
> restores 
>   Kern> correctly what is backed up.
>   >> 
>   Kern> It is another variant of the fact that Bacula uses timestamps for 
> diff/inc 
>   Kern> backups so doesn't know when files are deleted,  and if files are 
> added with 
>   Kern> old timestamps, it doesn't know they are added -- until you do a full 
> save.
>   >> 
>   >> Well, yes, you can say that it is a bug in backup too because it doesn't 
> save
>   >> enough information for restore to work :-)
> 
>   Mario> As far as i understood it, a moved file should change its timestamp 
> (due
>   Mario> to the postix standard), and therefore it should be included in the
>   Mario> backup.
> 
> Yes, the ctime is changed by mv on many UNIX filesystems.  However, in your
> original post you seemed to be moving the directory /tmp/trash_big_files.
> While the ctime of that directory might change, the ctimes of the files within
> it will not change

If this case is how it should be (regarding to the postix standards),
then bacula will NOT backup those files which are in
my /tmp/trash_big_files folder, right?

It will only backup the trash_big_files foler itself?

Cheers, Mario



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to