Nicolas Stein wrote:

> - A Sata drive is 150MB/s, not counting the RAID, again, even with all
> software losses, it is still much higher...

The SATA bus may be 150MB/s, but I think you'll have trouble finding a
drive that does much more than 30-50MB/s except from its cache :)

Doesn't look like the drive is your bottleneck though. My guess would be
your tape drive or database.

As a quick test, you could possibly use sqlite and store the database
files on a ramdisk (you'll need a fair sized ramdisk, but nothing too
crazy if you're just doing a quick test).

You could also try out the spooling options, if your boxes running the
SD (I think this is where the data gets spooled, would need to check the
docs to be sure) have the space.

-- 
Russell Howe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening
July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, 
AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to