On Wed, 18 May 2005 14:45:50 -0700, Ryan LeBlanc wrote: > We are running tests with Bacula to see if it will work in our > environment. So far, we are very impressed! > > We have, however, run into a small problem. We do a full backup of a > folder, and all files are copied as expected. We then put a file into > this folder. It, however is an old file with a create/modified date > older than the latest full backup. However, this file is "new" to the > folder. Bacula ignores this file in the incremental backup. The next > full backup to come along backs the file up as expected, along with > everything else in the folder. > > Is this a bug, by design, or a configuration problem on our end?
I also have this problem with Windows clients. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
