On Thursday 19 May 2005 08:00, Masopust Christian wrote:
> All right, here's the message i got when this backup was run:
>
>
> 18-May 03:05 atpcc7fc-dir: Start Backup JobId 235,
> Job=atpc4ujc-data.2005-05-18_03.05.02
> 18-May 03:05 atpc4ujc-fd: Could not stat D:/CD-Copy: ERR=The system
> cannot find the path specified.^M
>
> 18-May 03:05 atpc4ujc-fd: Could not stat D:/CM-Share: ERR=The system
> cannot find the path specified.^M
>
> 18-May 03:05 atpc4ujc-fd: Could not stat D:/SUS: ERR=The system cannot
> find the path specified.^M
>
> 18-May 03:05 atpcc7fc-dir: Bacula 1.36.3 (22Apr05): 18-May-2005 03:05:13
> JobId: 235
> Job: atpc4ujc-data.2005-05-18_03.05.02
> Backup Level: Incremental, since=2005-05-17 03:05:04
> Client: atpc4ujc-fd
> FileSet: "atpc4ujc-data" 2005-05-07 03:25:00
> Pool: "WinPCPool"
> Storage: "WinPC"
> Start time: 18-May-2005 03:05:04
> End time: 18-May-2005 03:05:13
> FD Files Written: 0
> SD Files Written: 0
> FD Bytes Written: 0
> SD Bytes Written: 0
> Rate: 0.0 KB/s
> Software Compression: None
> Volume name(s): WinPCPool-0001
> Volume Session Id: 105
> Volume Session Time: 1115965854
> Last Volume Bytes: 16,014,022,604
> Non-fatal FD errors: 3
> SD Errors: 0
> FD termination status: OK
> SD termination status: OK
> Termination: Backup OK -- with warnings
>
>
> and the FileSet definition for this job is:
>
> FileSet {
> Name = "atpc4ujc-data"
> Include {
> Options {
> signature = MD5
> compression = GZIP6
> }
> File = "D:/CD-Copy"
> File = "D:/CM-Share"
> File = "D:/SUS"
> }
> }
>
>
> i know that i need to check the messages of my jobs very carefully, but
> in this case i think it would be better to have an error than an "ok with
> warnings"..
>
> what do you think about this?
Often administrators will add a list of directories and files for multiple
machines, and on some they may not be there. In such a situation, I don't
want my backups to bomb off and be totally useless. Thus, the clear
indication that the backup terminated OK, but there were problems (with
warnings). Regardless whether it is a person or a computer looking at the
Job output, it should be clear enough -- IMO.
>
> chris
>
>
> -----UrsprÃngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2005 20:44
> An: Masopust Christian
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: Confusing "OK"-Message after restore
>
> Hello,
>
> You should always copy the list.
>
> Without seeing the exact messages you received, I cannot comment other than
> to
> say that if there are any ERROR messages, Bacula will not issue an OK. It
> may print lots of informational messages, and if you restricted it (perhaps
> by default) from descending into other filesystems, it will tell you.
>
> On Wednesday 18 May 2005 20:41, Masopust Christian wrote:
> > Hi Kern,
> >
> > I don't know if it's correct to write directly to you, but I try ;-))
> >
> > Last night i had a problem with one of my Windows-Server-Disks, it
> > was not responding any longer.
> >
> > I had a backup-job running which only backups directories from this
> > disk. When looking at the status of my backups in the morning, i found
> > everything run "OK".... Only when having a closer look to the whole
> > message i found the warnings that the directories were not found....
> >
> > shouldn't this be handled as an error? or at least an error when none
> > of the files/directories configured in the fileset can be saved?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
--
Best regards,
Kern
(">
/\
V_V
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id344&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
