> On Sat, 2005-04-23 at 23:47 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > Yes. Here are the lines from my rc.local that start the tunnels: >> > # added by JDG on 2005/04/08 to encrypt connections TO the bacula >> > # storage daemon >> > /usr/sbin/stunnel -D 6 -S 0 -d 29103 -r localhost:9103 -p >> > /usr/share/ssl/certs/host.key.pem >> That's not the proper way to run it on FD machine. >> Use stunnel -c -d localhost:29103 -r SDmachine:9202 -p ..... > It's not the FD machine. It's the SD/Dir machine. ok, I misunderstood your lines than (the TO word confused me). It seems good ways than. Do you use any type of application level firewall? Any other custom and exocitoc routing and network setup? If you remove stunnel protection does it work (with test datas, off course). The only diferrence between your stunnel rule and mine is that I use the -A option (CA certificate file) at SD machine. I don't think that's the mistake but who knows...
bye, Ago ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
