> > Actually I have no idea why I did my script in /bin/sh, maybe I had
> > something off for lunch that day:-).
> If you ever check perl vs sh, you'll find that perl is HUGE
Most linux people probably have bash pretending to be /bin/sh, and
a fresh perl is only about 30% bigger than a fresh bash in memory
footprint on the RH9 machine I just tried it on.
Of course, this is because bash is ridiculously bloated, not because
perl is slim.
Actually I think I stuck to sh because I have the vague hope of trying
to see if bacula will run on the nslu2 box I'm putting in place to
hold the backups, and so keeping perl out of everything I do with
bacula seemed like a good idea at the time.
^_^
(O O)
\_/@@\
\\~~/
~~
- RJC
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
