> Hello. > > Jens R. Victorin wrote: > > >>I've noticed something, purely accidential. > >>>05-Apr 09:34 goblin-dir: Recycled volume "DAT-120-0019" > >>>05-Apr 09:34 goblin-sd: Please mount Volume "DAT-120-0019" on Storage > >>>Device "Sun" for Job Ork.2005-04-05_08.20.00 > >>>05-Apr 09:36 goblin-sd: Recycled volume "DAT-120-0019" on device > >>>"/dev/nst2", all previous data lost. > >>>05-Apr 09:36 goblin-sd: New volume "DAT-120-0019" mounted on device > >>>/dev/nst2 at 05-Apr-2005 09:36. > > >>05-Apr 09:38 goblin-dir: There are no Jobs associated with Volume > >>"DAT-120-0019". Marking it purged. > > >>05-Apr 09:52 goblin-dir: Recycled volume "DAT-120-0019" > > > By comparing timestamps I think everything looks OK! Why do you think the > > tape was recycled irregularly? > > See above: Recycling 1 at 9:39 - ok > 2 at 9:52 - once more?
Well... from your original post it's plain that both the sd and the dir signals the recycling at different times. Maybe the message is queued somewhere and thats the reason for the delay. I wouldn't take the timestamps too seriously but it's important to me that a backup isn't corrupted. Have you checked it for any inconsistencies? > > And, of course, the VolFiles in the catalog. > True, that's strange... /Jens ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
