Gianpaolo Serafini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm working on a project to implement a centralized > backup system. The system includes about 50 host to be > protected at various levels. The hosts as different > operative systems: Solaris 8.0, Windows Server (2000 > and 2003), Windows 2000 Pro, Win Xp, Win NT, Linux > (motly Debian, some RedHat). The global amount of data > is about 1.5 Tb. Every host as different backup needs > regarding to amount of data a frequency of variation. > At the moment we are evaluating some complete > solutions including hardware (TAPE autoloader and disk > array) plus, of course, the software. > For example we are discussing on solution by Dell > hardware and CommVault Galaxy backup software. Another > solution comes from IBM with Tivoli storage manager. > These solutions appear robust and fit perfectly with > our company. Anyway I'm really attracted by open > source solutions like bacula. Is there anyone that can > give me any help to compare bacula system performance > with these commercial products?
Bacula probably isn't for you if you need to backup a lot of Win32 machines. It can't do bare metal recovery on win32 and it can't back up all win32 files if some are locked or open. Bacula works best with *nix environments. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
