Hello,

On 8/30/22 02:57, Wanderlei Huttel wrote:
Hello Eric

I know that you said that Debian repositories are not so simple and
flexible like Red Hat yum, but without a clear and correct documentation is
not friendly to install Bacula Community

I noticed that all documentation is wrong, is pointing for Bacula
Enterprise repository instead Bacula Community, and I've tried the
repository example link that you've sent me  but no succes to install
13.0.1 (Debian 11 bullseye)
https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXXX/debs/13.0.1/dists/bullseye/main/binary-amd64/INSTALL

Thanks, I have fixed the INSTALL file

I've tried this way "deb
https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXX/debs/13.0.0/bullseye-64/ bullseye
main", it worked, but it looks apt-get update ignore something

No, it's more https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXX/debs/13.0.0 bullseye main

root@debian:/usr/src# apt-get update
Atingido:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security
InRelease
Atingido:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease
Atingido:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease
Atingido:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports InRelease
Ign:5 https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXX/debs/13.0.0/bullseye-64
bullseye InRelease
Atingido:6 https://www.bacula.org/packages/XXXXX/debs/13.0.0/bullseye-64
bullseye Release
Lendo listas de pacotes... Pronto
root@debian:/usr/src#

I do not understand how Debian repositories work, but I guess Bacula System
has more knowledge to fix or improve this
Would it be possible to fix the documentation for at least of the last 5
versions?

I'm not planing to fix old releases for the moment, people should install
the latest version, but any help is welcome if you have patches.

Thanks,

Best Regards,
Eric


_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to