On 11/22/2011 11:14 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Hi Bruno and everyone else, > > Please keep in mind that I also submitted a systemd-related patch, though mine > was only for bacula-fd and added socket activation [1]. I’m not sure > if/where/when this has actually been merged, I don’t really get the bacula > development/branch model (but I don’t try to, either). > > Bruno: Your service file for bacula-fd looks way heavier than mine, though, > maybe you can highlight and comment on the differences? > > Best regards, > Michael > > [1] > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=201105041029.p44AT9hN017672%40higson.cam.lispworks.com&forum_name=bacula-devel
Michael, I didn't want to change any feature of bacula actually. Usage about the socket activation could be cool, but I'm not 100% sure about it. And need to be discussed/organized up & down stream. What we prepare, is something non intrusive. just a drop in replacement for the init script. For the field : people on systemd help me to review and get it right + man systemdXXXX -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch openSUSE Member & Ambassador GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
