Dear Developers This proposal doesn't have to by applied now, so it's mainly a reflection for the next run 5.3dev 5.4x
Most of the package system (rpm / apt) and associated tools doesn't play well with beta rc string in number making it always complicated for no good reasons 5.2.0rc2 is > than 5.2.0 (work if we start at 5.2.1) On what I see, most big project now use this numbering politics alpha stage start with 5.1.6x to 5.1.79 beta are mostly in the range 5.1.80 to 5.1.89 rc are in 5.1.90 - 5.1.99 This is limiting the number of beta and rc but shouldn't be a big trouble for Bacula :D so if we apply this to the current trunk : 5.2.0rc2 would be numbered 5.1.92 Is that works for you, yes no doesn't care, shut-up etc -- Bruno Friedmann Ioda-Net Sàrl www.ioda-net.ch openSUSE Member & Ambassador GPG KEY : D5C9B751C4653227 irc: tigerfoot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
