Tonight I was doing a backup of my laptop over its wireless connection. The connection blipped. The backup failed. My ssh session continued. Mind you, there was no traffic going over the ssh session at the time. FYI: my laptop has a static IP.
Why is Bacula comms more sensitive than SSH comms? I know this comes up from time to time amongst users, but I had no idea it was so sensitive. Is this something difficult to achieve? I know I don't have the expertise in comms. Here are some lines from the job output 03-Mar 01:55 laptop-fd JobId 54312: Error: /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/bsock.c:393 Write error sending 65536 bytes to Storage daemon:kraken.example.org:9103: ERR=Input/output error 03-Mar 01:55 laptop-fd JobId 54312: Fatal error: /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/filed/backup.c:1024 Network send error to SD. ERR=Input/output error 03-Mar 01:56 laptop-fd JobId 54312: Error: /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/bsock.c:339 Socket has errors=1 on call to Storage daemon:kraken.example.org:9103 -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
