Kern Sibbald wrote: >Hello, > >Unfortunately, it is always much more complicated than one would want.
True from my end too - which is why the patch was in the message body
rather than a real attachment ;-)
>What you show below looks good to me.
>
>Could you send me the patch as an attachment to avoid all problems with
>mailer
>wrap and such? Thanks.
Attached properly now. My rpmbuild command still fails with
mock-chroot> rpmbuild -D 'build_centos5 1' -D 'build_sqlite 1' -ba
bacula.spec
...
symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libbac.so.1.0.0.debug to
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libbac.so.debug
symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libbacsql.so.1.0.0.debug to
/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libbacsql.so.1.debug
8095 blocks
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip
/usr/bin/objdump
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
error: Bad owner/group: /builddir/build/SPECS/bacula.spec
RPM build errors:
Bad owner/group: /builddir/build/SPECS/bacula.spec
Any immediate ideas? I'll have a look when I can, but I'm about to
start a major OS upgrade on a main production server, so I'll be a bit
busy for a while...
You should really aim for a .spec in the tarball that works to build the
rpms entirely from that tarball.
Moray.
"To err is human. To purr, feline"
bacula-logwatch.patch
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
