>>>>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:16:30 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
> 
> On Tuesday 22 December 2009 20:09:49 Phil Stracchino wrote:
> > Martin Simmons wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:01:55 -0500, Phil Stracchino said:
> > >>
> > >> The relevant Makefile fragment is:
> > >>
> > >> libbac.la: Makefile $(LIBBAC_OBJS)
> > >>     @echo "Making $@ ..."
> > >>     $(LIBTOOL_LINK) $(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEBUG) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
> > >> $(LIBBAC_OBJS) -export-dynamic -rpath $(libdir) -version-info
> > >> $(LIBBAC_LT_CURRENT):$(LIBBAC_LT_REVISION):$(LIBBAC_LT_AGE) $(WRAPLIBS)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> DEFAULT_OBJECT_TYPE is correctly defined to .lo in the Makefile.  It
> > >> appears that the line:
> > >>
> > >> LIBBAC_OBJS = $(LIBBAC_SRCS:.c=$(DEFAULT_OBJECT_TYPE))
> > >>
> > >> is not actually working on OpenBSD as it is intended to.
> > >>
> > >> If I manually perform the expansion and edit the Makefile accordingly,
> > >> the same problem occurs with LIBBACCFG_OBJS, then with LIBBACPY_OBJS.
> > >> If I manually expand both of these as well, then also fix LIBOBJS in
> > >> src/findlib/Makefile, the build completes and installs, and the client
> > >> (at least) appears to work fine.
> > >
> > > Some BSD makes can't cope with nested expansions like that.  Try using
> > > GNU make.
> >
> > A quick test shows that this is indeed the problem.  Unfortunately, the
> > same testing also shows that gnu make cannot be used as a
> > general-purpose replacement for BSD make on current OpenBSD systems, as
> > BSD make contains ports-specific functionality without which nothing can
> > be compiled using the BSD ports system.
> >
> > For a standalone build, this is a surmountable problem, as we can simply
> > require that Bacula be compiled using gmake on OpenBSD.  For people
> > trying to build Bacula from ports, though, it's a real catch-22 - you're
> > damned if you do, and damned if you don't.
> 
> Thanks Martin.
> 
> Our scripts should not be gnu make dependent (nor bash dependent).  That 
> said, 
> if you don't have what I would call a "standard" make (such as found on 
> Solaris) then there will probably be some porting problems.
> 
> We'll take a look at it to ensure we haven't slipped in some gnu dependency.

This particular case may be a bug in BSD make, because later versions of
FreeBSD make do support it.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel

Reply via email to