> The tone of your e-mail doesn't seem productive. From what I can tell > so far you seem to be spending more time attempting to change how Kern > and the other developers code Bacula then moving the project forward.
I am trying to improve the project, too. It just seems that I point out open issues that have got a lower priority so far. > Kern and the other contributors have made an excellent backup package. That's fine ... > I don't know of a better one at any price. Please be constructive and work > with them in such a way that your not attempting to change how they work. I propose specific software changes. Such suggestions can result in adjustments for working styles if potential fixes will ever get accepted. > Please avoid being confrontational or snarky to the current developers, they > deserve respect. It might take a bit of time to get accommodated to the rules and guidelines of this project. > The patch as provided is 7019 lines and not something that one can see > the changes by eye, thus I don't know what's in it. An alternative update file shows the interesting changes more directly. https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=1455848152%40web.de > If the patch is something that is productive to the project please send in the > FSFE license paper work or Kern will not accept the change how ever > good they are. He got it already. Regards, Markus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
