On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 03:24:36PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello Scott, > > I've now resolved two bugs with version 3.0.0 and resolved a implementation > flaw concerning the Volume reservation system that I discovered a day before > the 3.0.0 release, and I would like to coordinate this with your release of > rpms depending on your planned schedule. > > As I see it, we have two possibilities: > > 1. I release a 3.0.1 source update > > or > > 2. I make a patch for 3.0.0 that includes all the current fixes. > > Then if it fits with your planning, we include this with your rpms. > > What do you think? >
To me it sounds better to do a 3.0.1 source release and then package 3.0.1 rpms.. -- Pasi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
