>>>>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:56:13 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
>
> On Monday 12 January 2009 14:39:14 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > >>>>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:32:35 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
> > >
> > > Hello Dan,
> > >
> > > Could you please update to the latest version of the SVN (both
> > > trunk/bacula and trunk/regress) and tell me if the problem is fixed? It
> > > is hard to test here since all my machines have a gmake. If you have
> > > gmake on your system, Bacula should now use it when appropriate or skip
> > > the calls. However, I am almost sure there are other problems that I did
> > > not see lurking in the code, so it make take a few tries.
> >
> > There are still two direct uses of make clean in bacula's main configure
> > script. I think they should be ${MAKE:-make} clean like this:
>
> What is wrong with simply "make"? Those scripts are *nix compatible, and in
> the few places where they are not *nix compatible (Win32 directories), the
> make call will either be replaced by gmake (if it exists on the machine) or
> skipped.
It is good for consistency, since all other places in configure that use make
do it using ${MAKE:-make}. Also, the system make might be broken (the
DEFAULT_OBJECT_TYPE stuff defeats make on FreeBSD 4.9).
__Martin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bacula-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
