On Oct 8, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Yuri Timofeev wrote: > Good work! > But... > I think the test is not quite correct. ;) > I am talking about the command "COPY" in PostgreSQL. > > In other words, I think that COPY and INSERT performed differently. > "COPY" must be implemented faster than individual "INSERT" into real > Bacula Job.
Yes, COPY, if doing multiple rows, should be faster than INSERT. > I may be wrong. I may be too. I doubt it. > > -- Dan Langille http://langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
