Bill Moran wrote: > So, my question would be, is dbcheck's performance important enough to > do that with? As a utility program that doesn't really get run that > often, it's quite likely a misdirection of resources. Granted, don't > turn down the patch ... if it helps MySQL without hurting anything else, > go for it.
Point: If everything Bacula does is within a transaction, why is dbcheck required? -- Dan Langille BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/ PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
