On Jun 19, 2008, at 4:50 PM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > El Jueves, 19 de Junio de 2008 21:43, escribió: >> On Jun 19, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: >>> El Miércoles, 18 de Junio de 2008 09:51, Kern Sibbald escribió: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the idea. >>>> >>>> At the current time, we do not add or features that are specific >>>> to a >>>> particular database unless it would make a dramatic improvement to >>>> Bacula, >>>> which I don't think applies here. If we were to do so, it would >>>> increase >>>> the support burden, which is already a bit overwhelming ... >>> >>> Hello, PostgreSQL also support table partitioning, moreover long >>> ago and it >>> could be a very, very high improvement on database operations. >> >> That can be achieved independent of Bacula. > > Yes, of course I have done it with the PostgreSQL backend, I was > only trying > to show that it's not a matter of bacula itself, maybe on a wrong way.
Then perhaps you want to explain it again or in a different way. Or just document it on at http://wiki.bacula.org/ -- Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
