On Tuesday 11 December 2007 19:01, Ilya M. Slepnev wrote: > Hello, > > We can't keep buffer in memory because it is too expensive. For example, if > we have a 15 minutes interval and 30 Mb/s, than we have to use about 3 gb > of memory. Sounds ugly.
If you read what I wrote (possibly reading between the lines a bit), you will see that I suggested to keep something like 10 to 100 buffers in memory between the ACKs. 100 such buffers would probably amount to less than 1MB of main memory. This could be something that the user configures as well. > Instead of that we can store somewhere a list of > backed up files, so we can recover a job, that has been hanged up. Does it > sound reasonable, or I'm missing something? That might be possible, but would be a lot more work, IMO. Best regards, Kern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
