On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:42, Scott Barninger wrote: > On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 12:32 -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2007 at 12:28, Scott Barninger wrote: > > > > > But the entire doc source tarball is still a source in the > > > packages. So I'm thinking about changing that and making only the > > > pdf manuals (user and developer) actual sources in the RPM > > > package. > > > > I see no reason for the source files to be in the packages for the > > documentation. My suggestion: split the docs into source and > > "binary". > > > To be a bit more explicit, the bacula-docs tarball we publish has > actually been build before releasing it. I have always included that > tarball as a source and then installed a few pieces. I'm suggesting to > just install the pdf manuals and skip the html manual if that doesn't > cause anyone grief. I think pdf is universal enough at this point.
What about two tarballs? PDF. HTML. -- Dan Langille two conferences, one trip, great value: May 2007 BSDCan - The BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/ PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.pgcon.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
