-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chow Loong Jin wrote on 15/02/11 17:05: > > On Tuesday 08,February,2011 09:36 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: >> >> A window's close button should close the window. Anything else the >> program does should aim for the least overall distraction. > > Please correct me if I am wrong, but does this not mean that the > original behaviour of having the media players (Banshee and Rhythmbox) > close their windows, but remain running in the background, ready to > resume at a moment's notice, is the correct behaviour after all?
I don't claim to be an expert on when a media player should unload itself. What I do claim is that hardly anyone else is an expert on that topic either. :-) It's something best worked out by the Banshee and Rhythmbox developers. > It seems to me that the original behaviour (as opposed to the current > behaviour) closes the window and yields the least overall distraction, > thus complying with the statement you made. The user does not need to > know that the media player is actually still running in the background. > The "Quit" action does create a bit of confusion in that case though. It does. That much, at least, is easily solved: rename it to "Close". <http://design.canonical.com/2011/03/quit/> - -- mpt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk12DzcACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecp6pACeP4VfyMoK39gEq9Y+GoURpQJR p4QAnis8F6cPiqHs6MvElEAZbWPRCWtg =GLek -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
