-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott Kitterman wrote on 22/06/10 18:01: > > "Matthew Paul Thomas" <m...@canonical.com> wrote: >... >> Scott Kitterman wrote on 22/06/10 11:54: >>> >>> "Matthew Paul Thomas" <m...@canonical.com> wrote: >>>... >>>> Yes, we agreed at UDS that we should move towards installing updates >>>> automatically whenever possible. But it's still important to make >>>> the interface for manual updates interface the best we can. >>> >>> We did? The current updates framework is almost completely >>> unsuitable for this. >>> ... >> >> Yes. >> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-m-update-manager-incremental-updates> >> > I don't think that's what that spec says.
The blueprint has no spec, but it is what the blueprint says: "attempt to get unattended-upgrades more used in maverick". I didn't write the whiteboard, but it matches my recollection of the UDS session. > It discusses offering automatic updates more prominently and making > them work better. Your description sounded to me like an intention to > make them opt-out. As long as they are opt-in, I think that spec is > completely reasonable. Nobody I know of has suggested that updates be opt-out for Maverick. - -- Matthew Paul Thomas http://mpt.net.nz/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwrDBgACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecqgOgCfcwsApMZBBL0m8aRTtu4GEI2i vHAAoLeOt3G8bMtlGJSGnrFBX6+PtDZM =3f3p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
