On 14 May 2010 11:58, Conscious User <consciousu...@aol.com> wrote: >> A valid point I got from a Mac user: Selecting the file to use quick >> look is more often used than actually opening the file (because it is >> quicker …). That would be a problem if we actually had quick look or >> another kind of preview. ;) > > Again, I think some of you are giving *way* too much importance > to "most used" and treating it as if it meant the same as "the > only one used".
I mentioned doing usability tests. My point is that the most used should be the most easily accessible. Does anyone disagree on that? > It seems to me that you only payed attention to what this Mac > user had to say because he mentioned that quick look is "more > often" used. I insist that non-opening actions being done > "more than very rarely" (that is, not necessarily "more often" > or even just "often") can be enough to make single-clicking > quite annoying at time. No, I actually only asked him when I had already written the rest of the post. Sorry for including it as it was not really relevant and confusing. > This reminds me of Google's auto-correction. It's an awesome > feature 99% of the time, but when I search for that uncommon > proper name that looks like a misspelled common word, it's > annoying to the point of hair pulling. Doesn’t Google only show the first two results for the auto-corrected word and below those the results for the exact word you put in? It does that for me. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
