Also from Jo: > In order to clean up, perhaps Canonical and Ubuntu would consider a much > louder support for XDG Base Directory Specification? Many developers are > hesitant to follow it, perhaps a strong leadership is required there as well? >
This seems like a real win, too. Looks like quite a few apps do support it. This sort of thing is useful for us to say "is a requirement for main inclusion in the next LTS", to try an accelerate adoption. Mark
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
