On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 10:32 +0800, Allan Caeg wrote: > The Ubuntu User Experience is aimed to be usable, helpful, unobtrusive, > evolving, stable, powerful beautiful, simple, consistent, customizeable, > and warm.
Usable by whom in what context, measured by what metrics? Beautiful? While you might sometimes see a majority of people agreeing regarding beauty, especially on a more general level, opinions tend to vary a lot. "Beautiful" lacks any kind of definition that would allow one to act based on it. Simple and consistent are not always good. They sometimes have a cost. <snip> This reads more like a manifest, not guidelines. It's overly idealistic and vague. I don't see anything that would cause anyone to act differently, as the underlying ideals/goals are already known. -- Thorsten Wilms thorwil's design for free software: http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
