Martín Soto wrote: >> > Third, I think we want some way for the user to influence this, but > we want it to be systemic (i.e. ONE knob for the WHOLE system, not > knobs-per-app-per-condition). We've talked about using the presence > state that is exposed in the FUSA work that Ted Gould did for 8.10. > I like that, but need to think about the real meaning of the various > states we expose there, with regard to notifications. The last > sketch I saw added a "Presentation" state, which was like > "Available" but silenced notifications. I think it's wrong to use > the term "Presentation" because that's only one use-case, but I > haven't formulated that thinking clearly enough to have a strong > counter-proposal yet. > > > I would also say the relevant mode is not strictly "Presentation" but > rather "people are looking, don't embarrass me, mom!" It's clear to me > that detecting the "don't embarrass me" situations automatically is not > always easy (yes, your boss may be looking over your shoulder...) but > there are certainly some obvious ones we can handle. The idea of > detecting the active video out goes precisely in this direction. > > Cheers, >
Labeling the FUSA "Presentation" state to a "Non-critical notifications" state with a checkbox is the simplest approach. *We cannot decide every app using full screen* , videos too can/cannot be disturbed by notification , several use cases have been presented here to illustrate both scenarios. When a simple FUSA checkbox can do the job why analyzing all the apps and breaking our heads over how to handle it?! cheers, mac_v _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
