Yesterday I grabbed an Awesome gadget to try out. It didn't work.
After several hours of mucking around, I discovered the gadget in question
was using the "wibox" facility (*not* the "awful.wibox" facility). I had
previously assumed these were essentially identical, but reviewing the code
for both clearly reveals they are very different.
For unknown reasons, the Debian 'awesome' package only includes
"awful.wibox", and "wibox" is nowhere to be found, which means I'd have to
install it by hand. So:
Is the absence of "wibox" a packaging error/omission? Which wibox
is Awesome going to be using going forward, i.e. should new code be using
"wibox" or "awful.wibox"?
Schwab
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
