No offense, but this kind of thing happens in every community once in a while. A (new) guy wants to create his own site, get everyone on it, and then claim it's the "ultimate community" thing. Such things are only good for your ego (if you were even able to achieve it, which you're not), and is usually not actually helpful at all, as it only increases scattering of information, and is often not what we needed in the first place.
Dieter On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:13:24 +0200 "Christopher R. Parr" <[email protected]> wrote: > Look. As I said I'm new to awsome. And this could be a way easier to > understand for people interested in switching to awesome.. > > All I want is to build a plattform, which is open to anyone, no matter > what knowleges they have. As long as they want to know more, > awesomnia.org is here to help. > > Christopher > > 2012/5/14 Thorsten Sperber <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:59:34 +0200 > > Theodor van Nahl <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> because you choose a blog-software I have to ask: > >> What kind of community do you have in mind? > >> What should be the aim for an seperated awesome-community? > > > > > > A more general question from my side: where do you (by you I mean the > > list recipients) talk about awesome? I rarely do, mostly with people I > > already know (from the debian community). More technical questions find > > their way to the mailing list. If awesome.naquadah.org had a forum > > with the core devs as active members, I would probably have a look from > > time to time. But I surely wouldn't follow a blog driven by people who > > can't even help themselves in rather easy questions ;) Sorry, > > Christopher. > > > > Thorsten > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected]. > -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected].
