> I find all this fascinating, but I'm really not the one to be commenting on > what the best approach here is. I will say, however, that in many of my > applications, I would be more likely to chose a speed increase over reduced > memory. I tend to live with mostly compute-bound, control applications > though.
Thank you very much, this is very useful! Even if it's just one person's experience, at least it's *a* data point. May I ask, whay do you think of my RAM-for-ROM tradeoff idea? Is there one or the other that you more commonly run out of? > I've not had enough time to look at the code to make fine-grained > suggestions (and I'm out of practice with AVR ASM), but I've not felt that > the comments were too bad. I've been able to follow the code as written > easily enough. Yes, my original algorithm was excessively tricky. The last (and fastest) one is actually a lot simpler. _______________________________________________ AVR-libc-dev mailing list AVR-libc-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev