Reply-To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org On 16.03.17 08:54, David Brown wrote: > It might be a little heretical to ask here, but has anyone tried out the > experimental AVR backend in the latest llvm/clang release? I have not > made much use of clang, but it's been good for gcc to have a bit of > friendly competition. I think it will be interesting to see how > clang/llvm differs from gcc for the AVR.
No, I haven't tried it. As even gcc backend support moves at a sedate pace, I'm moved to wonder who works on the llvm avr backend? Your move to discover what user base it has is a good one, but after a couple of decades of using gcc on multiple targets, I'm probably rusted on to the toolchain which has served me so well for so long in so many battles. Erik _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
