Erik Walthinsen <om...@omegacs.net> wrote: > On 02/16/2014 12:48 PM, Joerg Wunsch wrote: >> As far as avr-libc is concerned, that's not necessary, since it's BSD-style >> licensed.
> No, but for gcc and binutils getting the patches upstream does require > FSF paperwork. I think adding a new device should count as a trivial change that doesn't require a copyright assignment. In GCC, it's basically a one-line change (albeit it is followed by more changes, but they are for automatically generated files, so they should not require a copyright assignment either). > However, I have no idea how much it would take to actually get the > maintainers to accept the changes. The problem is there's not so much active developers for AVR-GCC at all. -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
