On Jan 14, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Mark Litwack <mlitw...@employees.org> wrote:
> I thought Todd's suggestion would have nailed it for sure... And > David is right you don't need the reti(); it is only used when writing > a naked ISR. Who knows what evil is lurking in the stack on a > premature return. You don't return to where you thought you'd return. And registers don't have the contents they had when the ISR was dispatched. Anything is possible. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net ============================================================ Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
