> -----Original Message----- > From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org [mailto:avr- > gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Joerg > Wunsch > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 1:39 AM > To: avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] EF_AVR_LINKRELAX_PREPARED bit in e_flags > > Of course, it would have been nice if people wouldn't have started > using these ABI-incompatibility options in the first place, but they > do. Yes, I'm partially guilty for spreading them around :) by not > thoroughly thinking about what has once been distributed with Mfile. > I feel quite sorry for that.
Oh, geez, then we're both guilty of doing that 10 years ago. That's why I asked if this was even a real problem; 10 years and no complaints or issues about this area. (Pretty good track record, IMHO.) > We might perhaps concentrate on the more severe of those flags (-mint8 > [cough, cough] :-P (When can we get rid of it?.....) > and -fshort-enums immediately come to mind, as they > affect the size of certain objects). Point. Should we compile avr-libc with -fshort-enums? That one is a useful flag. I know that -fpack-struct is a nop. And -funsigned-char just kind of levels the playing field for those users who aren't used to using <stdint.h>. Eric _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
