> -----Original Message----- > From: avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org [mailto:avr- > gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of David > Brown > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 8:06 AM > To: dva...@internode.on.net > Cc: avr-gcc-list > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR Studio 4.19 does not work with AVR Toolchain > 3.4.0 (informative) > > For what it's worth, I too dislike the newer AVR Studio - partly because > I do most of my development work with Linux, and partly because even on > Windows it is a bloated mess. I can't figure out why they decided to > use MS VS as a base - the industry has practically standardised on > Eclipse, and the single biggest request from users for AVR Studio 5 was > that it be cross-platform. But I guess Atmel had their reasons, and > they are certainly good at making the compiler toolchain easily > available from Linux, so I don't want to complain /too/ much. > > mvh., > > David
There's a difference between complaining, and providing honest feedback. I don't think that you are complaining. Saying that the "single biggest request from users for AVR Studio 5 was that it be cross-platform" doesn't necessarily make it so. Yes, there's a lot of anecdotal evidence. But this is why a survey is absolutely necessary, to actually get the numbers to back up that statement. Eric Weddington _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
