On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM, David Brown <da...@westcontrol.com> wrote:
> I agree with what you are saying. I'm just trying to suggest that getting > Haskell to work on the AVR is more akin to getting Linux to work on the AVR > - while perhaps Lua, OCAML, more C++, or other options might be a better > balance. the C++ part is what falls squarely on my shoulders -- for various reasons. > I also think they might be more likely to work - it would be a > shame for the students to spend ages getting all the bits in place for > Haskell on the AVR, only to find out that their quicksort example program > runs out of memory with more than 4 elements. Don't worry too much about that. [...] > I don't disagree with you on any of your points - I just want to be sure > that Gaby knows what he is getting into here, yes, don't worry about that :-) > and that his time and effort is well spent. Various people (including my family) have dramatically different ideas about how my limited time should be spent :) -- Gaby _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
