On 4/29/12 11:46 AM, Alex Iljin wrote: > In the same way I define DEBUG_ASSERT_PROGMEM macro. > It is OK, but I want to use many trace and assert functions, so there > is a question. > Is there way to place function name in program memory? > Maybe there are specific __FUNC_PROGMEM__ marco, or some compiler parameters, > which switch __func__ from charecter array to string literal?
I had thought that __FUNCTION__ and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ acted like string literals and could be used this way, but I just tested and they seem to act like __func__. The type of __func__ is presumably dictated by the C++ standard, but __FUNCTION__ and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ are gcc-isms. Is there a technical reason that the compiler couldn't treat them as equivalent to a double-quoted string? _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
