> -----Original Message-----
> From: andyw.l...@gmail.com [mailto:andyw.l...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Andy
> Warner
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:08 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Wim Lewis; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Confusing volatile behaviour with 4.6.2
> 
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Weddington, Eric
> <eric.wedding...@atmel.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>       Hi Wim,
> 
>       Do you have a GCC bug report filled out for this issue?
> 
> 
> 
> If the consensus is that this is a genuine bug (there's an awful lot
of
> false bug reports involving volatiles), I'm happy to do my part and
file
> the report to get it recorded.

>From experience there's also a lot of genuine bugs involving volatiles.
(There's a paper by a friend who's a CS professor at University of Utah
that goes into quite a lot of detail on a number of different compilers
and their bugs regarding volatile.)

I'd rather get it in a bug report, so we can get the details recorded
and not lost in a mailing list, no matter what the outcome. It's
generally safer that way. :-)

Eric

_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list

Reply via email to