Szikra Istvan <steven.sp...@gmail.com> wrote: > -bootloader section cannot have calls to the application section !
That's only your problem though. The compiler can reasonably expect you to include all its helper functions into the resulting binary. I agree it's a pessimization here, but it's correct code. The compiler cannot have any idea about you distinguishing between an application and a bootloader area. Rule of thumb: whenever you are tempted to create a separate ..bootloader section, you are usually wrong. The bootloader is simply a standalone application of its own, so compile/link it that way. > if I wanted modulo, I would have written % It's a machine. The optimizer is tuned to catch situations which the developer didn't write in a machine-friendly (but usually in a user-friendly) way, and from its point of view, your code probably just looks like a poor attempt to write down a simple division/modulus operation. The only fault of the optimizer here is to not recognize that including the library function will result in larger code. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
