The jumptable could just as easily be written in C. > -----Original Message----- > From: > avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu.org > [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of Jan Waclawek > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:21 AM > To: Robert von Knobloch; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Allocating variables to a fixed address > > > I'd write the *jumptable* in asm. That's easy and means one > less degree of freedom for the compiler and co. > > JW > > -----Original Message----- > To realise this interface (API), I must be able define the > variables/function calls in the resident part at known (or. at least > fixed) addresses. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > AVR-GCC-list mailing list > AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list >
_______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
