Weddington, Eric wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
org] On Behalf Of John Regehr
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:23 PM
To: David Brown
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR LLVM backend?
I'm pretty sure this is not an issue (anymore, at least). I could be
wrong. The recently-added PIC port of LLVM would be a good
place to start
looking.
Ummm... are you sure they mean PIC as in a processor from Microchip, or
do they mean PIC as in Position Independent Code?
That particular collision in the acronym name space is a frequent cause
of confusion among embedded developers....
-dave
Oh, really?! I didn't know that they supported PIC.
How interesting....
PIC is of course a particularly evil target. I
claim that if it
can be supported at all, AVR should be easy :).
;-)
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
