Charalampos Alexopoulos sez,
> Thank you for your answer, but i am not looking for the
> easiest way. I want to have some solution similar to previus
> example. I can use ISR's even with c++ with no problem, what
> i need, as i said before, is to assign a vector as a static
> class member in a way similar to other types like :
>
> class foo
> {
> public:
> static constant uint8_t data = 0x0a;
> ...
> }
>
> then you can use it from some other class like:
>
> uint8_t local_data = foo::data;
You scare me. Run away.
I always worry with C++ that I really don't understand what the
compiler is doing when it calls functions. I guess my thought is
that if you can't define the function as an isr inside the class
then what you are trying to do isn't supported.
If I were you and I'm not, I would have an ISR call your static
function, then exit. That will most likely work. In general
though I like to keep what I'm do in an ISR very simple (buffer
data, generate events, time critical stuff) and let the main loop
or a task handle the complex stuff.
Mr Foo
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
