On 7/22/08, Andy H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have noted problem where gcc is optimizing if-then-else constructs - with > disastrous results.
I inherited a lot of code from the Boss with big if-then-else trees: > Can folks try the following gcc option > > -fno-if-conversion I find no change with or without the above at -Os: 36,020 Flash, 1399 RAM used on Mega645: avr-gcc 20080512 4.3.0. I'm also running with: CFLAGS += -mcall-prologues if that maters. _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list