Eric,
I could check to see if direct constant is "odd" in C. It is not too
difficult.
However, its not trivial either and wont find "odd" symbols. So I'm
leaving that alone.
After all, if you are doing non-standard function pointer arithmetic,
you should be aware of what might go wrong.
Can you mark:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27192
as duplicate of 35013 and point to the same potential solution?
Both need testing, there might be hidden bug where we don't want pm()
around an expression.
I'm running testsuite - but it's slow!
Andy
Weddington, Eric wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 2:47 PM
To: Weddington, Eric
Cc: Wouter van Gulik; avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug35013 - Incomplete check for
pm() annotation
Thanks Eric , that was it.
Unfortunately it is only linker WARNING and easily missed during
compilation.
Hey, look! Something else to fix... ;-)
Eric
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
