On 10/17/07, John Regehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > can meet in the middle, where we all win. TinyOS is a great idea for sensor > > networks. I'd like to be able join forces to promote it further. I don't see > > It seems likely that the toolchain problems can be made to go away with > modest effort. > > Another step towards meeting in the middle could build on the "binary > component" feature of nesC, which was designed to support interoperation > with plain C. If some interfaces can be agreed upon, then drivers for > various devices can be written in C and reused in TinyOS, MantisOS, and > SoS.
Another variation on this approach is building a "kernel" in nesC/TinyOS, which has a nice C interface for application-level programs. I believe several people are looking into doing something like this. David Gay _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
