"Bob Paddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I realized my mistake about five seconds after hitting "Send". I > was passing a variable to __delay_us(), not compile time constant.
Oh, and I only read this about five seconds after sending my other reply... Alas, Björn's mailer (which is rather his employer's mailer) doesn't supply an in-reply-to header, so I didn't notice the thread already continued. > Is there any reason to prefer a macro over a inlined function or > vice-versa? The point with the inline version was that argument massaging (inside the implementation) appeared to be a bit simpler to me. You can have "local variables" that simplify expressing the calculations. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
